F

Is PSA Airlines reliable?

Ranked 70 of 74 US airlines on on-time record.

20,871 flights · February 2026 – July 2026 · US Bureau of Transportation Statistics

72.39%

Arrived on time

Within 15 minutes of schedule

6.89%

Cancelled

Share of scheduled flights

101 min

When late, late by

Average across delayed arrivals

72.95%

Delays it caused itself

Rest was weather, ATC or security

Reading PSA Airlines’ record

Cancellation is where PSA Airlines stands out, and not well: it cancelled 6.89% of its flights against a median of 1.29% across the airlines here — 5.3 times the typical rate. Cancellation is also the outcome that costs a traveller a day rather than an hour, and the one that triggers a refund entitlement where delay does not.

PSA Airlines sits in the bottom fifth of the 74 airlines measured.

Most of PSA Airlines’ delay was its own doing. Around 73% of the minutes it lost came from crew, maintenance and aircraft arriving late from earlier legs — causes inside the airline — rather than weather or air traffic control. That is the part a change of management can change, and the part that does not improve on its own.

The extremes are far apart. On DAB to CLT it arrived on time 84.96% of the time; on DFW to JAN the figure was 56.34%. Same airline, same fleet, same procedures — which is the clearest argument on this site for checking the route rather than the carrier.

On time Rarely cancels Short delays Own delays Consistent
Arrives on time 72.39%
Rarely cancels 6.89% cancelled
Short delays when late 101 min when late
Few self-inflicted delays 72.95% its own fault
Same wherever it flies ±7 pts across routes

Each axis is a percentile against the other US airlines in the same period, not an absolute score. Further out is better than most; nearer the centre is worse than most.

PSA Airlines in five measures

An airline's headline on-time rate hides more than it shows. Two carriers can both arrive on time 75% of the time while one is late by twelve minutes and the other by an hour, or while one is evenly mediocre everywhere and the other is excellent on most routes and dreadful on a few.

These five axes pull those apart. Each is scored against the other US airlines in the same period rather than on an absolute scale, because on-time rates cluster tightly enough that raw numbers would draw every carrier as the same shape.

Same everywhere is the one worth reading twice: it measures how far PSA Airlines's on-time rate moves from route to route. A carrier scoring low there has an average propped up by routes you may not be flying.

How PSA Airlines compares

Air Malta 87 1.6%
Air China 84 1.5%
SAS 84 1.5%
Thai Airways 81 1.5%
Delta Air Lines 82 1.5%
Icelandair 83 1.5%
Air Europa 80 1.4%
Japan Airlines 81 1.5%
Alaska Airlines 81 1.5%
Norwegian 80 1.5%
Virgin Atlantic 82 1.5%
Iberia 80 1.4%
Wizz Air 78 1.4%
KLM Cityhopper 78 1.4%
Wizz Air UK 78 1.4%
airBaltic 76 1.4%
British Airways 79 1.4%
Wizz Air Malta 76 1.4%
Vueling 77 1.4%
BA CityFlyer 77 1.4%
Qantas 79 1.4%
Loganair 79 1.4%
United Airlines 75 1.4%
easyJet 74 1.3%
Ryanair UK 73 1.3%
Aegean Airlines 74 1.3%
JetBlue Airways 75 1.4%
Envoy Air 79 1.4%
Ryanair 72 1.3%
QantasLink 79 1.4%
Aer Lingus 75 1.4%
Air Canada 76 1.4%
Eurowings 73 1.3%
Air Transat 71 1.3%
Jetstar 74 1.3%
Qatar Airways 77 1.4%
Lufthansa 74 1.3%
Air France 71 1.3%
BA Euroflyer 69 1.2%
Etihad Airways 74 1.3%
Jet2 68 1.2%
SunExpress 69 1.3%
Allegiant Air 69 1.2%
Gulf Air 79 1.4%
Emirates 73 1.3%
Finnair 74 1.3%
KLM 72 1.3%
Rex Airlines 72 1.3%
easyJet Europe 72 1.3%
Aurigny 73 1.3%
El Al 69 1.3%
TUI Airways 59 1.1%
PSA Airlines 72 1.3%
Blue Islands 66 1.2%
Kuwait Airways 78 1.4%
Royal Air Maroc 55 1.0%
Air India 47 0.8%

Figures cover February 2026 – July 2026 and are counted from the regulators' own published files. A grade describes the past and is not a prediction about a particular flight, nor a safety rating. How the grade is calculated →